<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mourdock&#039;s Right: God Knows and Loves Babies Conceived in Rape</title>
	<atom:link href="http://familiesagainstplannedparenthood.org/blog/2012/1024/mourdocks-right-god-knows-and-loves-babies-conceived-in-rape/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://familiesagainstplannedparenthood.org/blog/2012/1024/mourdocks-right-god-knows-and-loves-babies-conceived-in-rape/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 09:43:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Weatherbe</title>
		<link>http://familiesagainstplannedparenthood.org/blog/2012/1024/mourdocks-right-god-knows-and-loves-babies-conceived-in-rape/#comment-14420</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Weatherbe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2012 09:30:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://familiesagainstplannedparenthood.org/blog/?p=448#comment-14420</guid>
		<description>It is not as if those who pretend to be horrified at Mourock&#039;s position would protect all the unwanted unborn conceived through consensual sex. They&#039;d abort them too in their millions. It is Mourdock--and us--who should be horrified and say so. Imagine the interview going like this:
Q: You mean, you&#039;d force the girl to carry her pregnancy to term even when it was the product of a rape or incest? That&#039;s outrageous!!
A: So you&#039;re actually pro-life then, except in those two cases?
Q: No, of course not, I&#039;m pro-choice in all cases.
A: You mean your&#039;e in favor of murdering more than a million unborn babies in the U.S. each year, most conceived thru consensual sex? That&#039;s horrible!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is not as if those who pretend to be horrified at Mourock&#039;s position would protect all the unwanted unborn conceived through consensual sex. They&#039;d abort them too in their millions. It is Mourdock&#8211;and us&#8211;who should be horrified and say so. Imagine the interview going like this:<br />
Q: You mean, you&#039;d force the girl to carry her pregnancy to term even when it was the product of a rape or incest? That&#039;s outrageous!!<br />
A: So you&#039;re actually pro-life then, except in those two cases?<br />
Q: No, of course not, I&#039;m pro-choice in all cases.<br />
A: You mean your&#039;e in favor of murdering more than a million unborn babies in the U.S. each year, most conceived thru consensual sex? That&#039;s horrible!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
