Comments on: Why is Planned Parenthood trying to expand in Aurora? http://familiesagainstplannedparenthood.org/blog/2009/1012/parking/ Just another WordPress weblog Sun, 21 Mar 2010 04:15:27 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1 By: Roger http://familiesagainstplannedparenthood.org/blog/2009/1012/parking/#comment-9662 Roger Fri, 16 Oct 2009 18:25:49 +0000 http://familiesagainstplannedparenthood.org/blog/?p=322#comment-9662 Eric posted this synopsys of the events at the meeting: <a href="http://familiesagainstplannedparenthood.org/blog/2009/1016/pandd/" rel="nofollow">Committee Rubber Stamps PP Expansion</a>. Comments on this topic can be addressed there. God Bless, Roger Eric posted this synopsys of the events at the meeting: Committee Rubber Stamps PP Expansion. Comments on this topic can be addressed there.

God Bless,
Roger

]]> By: LB http://familiesagainstplannedparenthood.org/blog/2009/1012/parking/#comment-9659 LB Thu, 15 Oct 2009 22:57:11 +0000 http://familiesagainstplannedparenthood.org/blog/?p=322#comment-9659 I got back from the meeting a little while ago. They got 11 spaces. Interesting that there were at least 4 uniformed police there just because this was on the agenda. Obviously, the City wants to portray anyone against PP as being a threat. That is really shameful, treating Aurora citizens like that. I also wondered if collecting the names, addresses and phone numbers of the audience is standard procedure? Do we have to identify ourselves at public meetings now? I did it, but don't know if it was required. I got back from the meeting a little while ago. They got 11 spaces.

Interesting that there were at least 4 uniformed police there just because this was on the agenda. Obviously, the City wants to portray anyone against PP as being a threat. That is really shameful, treating Aurora citizens like that.
I also wondered if collecting the names, addresses and phone numbers of the audience is standard procedure? Do we have to identify ourselves at public meetings now? I did it, but don't know if it was required.

]]> By: Eric Scheidler http://familiesagainstplannedparenthood.org/blog/2009/1012/parking/#comment-9658 Eric Scheidler Thu, 15 Oct 2009 20:39:05 +0000 http://familiesagainstplannedparenthood.org/blog/?p=322#comment-9658 <strong>Karen:</strong> As far as I know, there was no action at all by the police on the alleged assault until January 2009, three months after it supposedly happened. If there were any Dominick's security cameras that recorded the incident, the data might not be around three months later (why would it be?). Might that be why they delayed three months on calling for information? <strong>Kel:</strong> I don't believe the woman who allegedly assaulted the PP employee was ever identified. It's a pretty grainy picture. But she doesn't look crazy to me in that picture. Who knows what really went on out there on October 1—if anything? For one thing, I find it fishy that there was no police blotter coverage of the incident. It's also, as I mentioned above, very strange that if they were so eager to get to the bottom of it they didn't give me a call. Maybe the woman smiling in that photo really did "grab" the Planned Parenthood worker's arm and badmouth her place of employment. On the other hand, maybe she gently touched her on the arm and said, "Honey, you don't have to work at that horrible place." Who knows? In any case, that's pretty shaky grounds for digging up a city easement, I think. Karen: As far as I know, there was no action at all by the police on the alleged assault until January 2009, three months after it supposedly happened.

If there were any Dominick's security cameras that recorded the incident, the data might not be around three months later (why would it be?). Might that be why they delayed three months on calling for information?

Kel: I don't believe the woman who allegedly assaulted the PP employee was ever identified. It's a pretty grainy picture. But she doesn't look crazy to me in that picture.

Who knows what really went on out there on October 1—if anything? For one thing, I find it fishy that there was no police blotter coverage of the incident. It's also, as I mentioned above, very strange that if they were so eager to get to the bottom of it they didn't give me a call.

Maybe the woman smiling in that photo really did "grab" the Planned Parenthood worker's arm and badmouth her place of employment. On the other hand, maybe she gently touched her on the arm and said, "Honey, you don't have to work at that horrible place." Who knows?

In any case, that's pretty shaky grounds for digging up a city easement, I think.

]]> By: Kel http://familiesagainstplannedparenthood.org/blog/2009/1012/parking/#comment-9657 Kel Thu, 15 Oct 2009 18:39:06 +0000 http://familiesagainstplannedparenthood.org/blog/?p=322#comment-9657 Did they ever identify that crazy protester? Did they ever identify that crazy protester?

]]> By: Sylvia http://familiesagainstplannedparenthood.org/blog/2009/1012/parking/#comment-9653 Sylvia Thu, 15 Oct 2009 02:22:12 +0000 http://familiesagainstplannedparenthood.org/blog/?p=322#comment-9653 One of the problems with lies is that it's hard to keep the details straight. Did anyone notice that according to PP's "Explanation of Project Needs", the supposed assault occurred INSIDE Dominick's? Now which was it, inside or outside? Witchita or Kansas City? "Secure" parking spaces behind and in front of security gates? Pro-aborts or pro-lifers murdered? This would be hysterical if the Aurora residents on these boards wouldn't keep swallowing these lies hook, line, and sinker. One of the problems with lies is that it's hard to keep the details straight. Did anyone notice that according to PP's "Explanation of Project Needs", the supposed assault occurred INSIDE Dominick's? Now which was it, inside or outside? Witchita or Kansas City? "Secure" parking spaces behind and in front of security gates? Pro-aborts or pro-lifers murdered?

This would be hysterical if the Aurora residents on these boards wouldn't keep swallowing these lies hook, line, and sinker.

]]> By: Karen Ulrich http://familiesagainstplannedparenthood.org/blog/2009/1012/parking/#comment-9652 Karen Ulrich Thu, 15 Oct 2009 00:58:44 +0000 http://familiesagainstplannedparenthood.org/blog/?p=322#comment-9652 If there was an "assalt" outside of Dominick's, the video camera's at that store should have caught that. Why did the police not request the tapes for the poor victim? Why did the victim not report this to Dominick's and ask them to preserve the tapes as "evidence" of this crime? How long does Dominick's save their video and if tapes from the assalt date exist, where are they stored now? If there was an "assalt" outside of Dominick's, the video camera's at that store should have caught that. Why did the police not request the tapes for the poor victim? Why did the victim not report this to Dominick's and ask them to preserve the tapes as "evidence" of this crime? How long does Dominick's save their video and if tapes from the assalt date exist, where are they stored now?

]]>