<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Free speech gets pro-lifers arrested in Maryland.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://familiesagainstplannedparenthood.org/blog/2008/0804/free-speech-gets-pro-lifers-arrested-in-maryland/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://familiesagainstplannedparenthood.org/blog/2008/0804/free-speech-gets-pro-lifers-arrested-in-maryland/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 05:18:08 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jerry Vilt</title>
		<link>http://familiesagainstplannedparenthood.org/blog/2008/0804/free-speech-gets-pro-lifers-arrested-in-maryland/#comment-8078</link>
		<dc:creator>Jerry Vilt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Sep 2008 10:08:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://familiesagainstplannedparenthood.org/blog/?p=260#comment-8078</guid>
		<description>I'm perplexed:

Your link in the forum...."Matters of Life and Death" - "Man.   He's got the truth!!"   AND above link....reply #49, both do NOT work on my computer! I think the computer "goes somewhere" but all I get is a blank screen!   I've got a state of the art (3 years old) with Windows Service Pack 3 and MS Office 2007 yet something is wrong?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;m perplexed:</p>
<p>Your link in the forum&#8230;.&#034;Matters of Life and Death&#034; - &#034;Man.   He&#039;s got the truth!!&#034;   AND above link&#8230;.reply #49, both do NOT work on my computer! I think the computer &#034;goes somewhere&#034; but all I get is a blank screen!   I&#039;ve got a state of the art (3 years old) with Windows Service Pack 3 and MS Office 2007 yet something is wrong?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karen K.</title>
		<link>http://familiesagainstplannedparenthood.org/blog/2008/0804/free-speech-gets-pro-lifers-arrested-in-maryland/#comment-8077</link>
		<dc:creator>Karen K.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Sep 2008 04:33:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://familiesagainstplannedparenthood.org/blog/?p=260#comment-8077</guid>
		<description>Try again:


http://video.google.com/googleplayer.swf?docid=6732659166933078950&#38;hl=en&#38;fs=true</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Try again:</p>
<p><a href="http://video.google.com/googleplayer.swf?docid=6732659166933078950&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=true" rel="nofollow">http://video.google.com/googleplayer.swf?docid=6732659166933078950&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=true</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JerryN</title>
		<link>http://familiesagainstplannedparenthood.org/blog/2008/0804/free-speech-gets-pro-lifers-arrested-in-maryland/#comment-7761</link>
		<dc:creator>JerryN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 15:19:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://familiesagainstplannedparenthood.org/blog/?p=260#comment-7761</guid>
		<description>Mr. Healy's letter (post 11) pretty much describes the type of harrassment pro-lifers have become accustomed to receiving over the years. Though the conflicting accounts of the incident make it hard to ascertain exactly what happened, it has been our experience that this fits the pattern of overly zealous authorities going too far.  Does this mean we "think the police are out to get pro-lifers" as was suggested by one of our blogger friends? Of course not. It simply reflects the reality of what pro-lifers have encountered many times throughout the country and the odds are high that in the end this will be exposed as yet another example of this.

It was also suggested here that the display of the Truth Tour photographs run afoul of FACE and should not be protected by the First Amendment. If there is a majority opinion (there will always be at least one person to espouse any issue) among legal scholars that supports this contention we are unaware of it. Signage is not prohibited under FACE provisions, which is not a surprise because such would be unconstitutional. 

If it should ever happen that displays used in the Truth Tours are prohibited it would seriously undermine one of the most effective means of political dissent. Propaganda ministers in totalitarian regimes have an ironclad grip on what the media and populace can share. That is one of the biggest differences between us and them. For example, would war protests stripped of the display of carnage be as effective in raising awareness of war's brutality? It is one thing for a country to go to war with the vast majority of its citizens blissfully unaware of the human costs to innocent non-combatants, but another thing altogether when people are confronted time and again with the harsh reality of what they are supporting. 

The reality of innocent unborn children being dismembered inside the womb is something many supporters of abortion do not want people to see. This is understandable because it contradicts what many of them have said for years: namely, that abortion simply removes a blob of tissue. The pictures tell a different story, that indeed these are our tiny brothers and sisters who have met a brutal end. Their lives have been denied them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. Healy&#039;s letter (post 11) pretty much describes the type of harrassment pro-lifers have become accustomed to receiving over the years. Though the conflicting accounts of the incident make it hard to ascertain exactly what happened, it has been our experience that this fits the pattern of overly zealous authorities going too far.  Does this mean we &#034;think the police are out to get pro-lifers&#034; as was suggested by one of our blogger friends? Of course not. It simply reflects the reality of what pro-lifers have encountered many times throughout the country and the odds are high that in the end this will be exposed as yet another example of this.</p>
<p>It was also suggested here that the display of the Truth Tour photographs run afoul of FACE and should not be protected by the First Amendment. If there is a majority opinion (there will always be at least one person to espouse any issue) among legal scholars that supports this contention we are unaware of it. Signage is not prohibited under FACE provisions, which is not a surprise because such would be unconstitutional. </p>
<p>If it should ever happen that displays used in the Truth Tours are prohibited it would seriously undermine one of the most effective means of political dissent. Propaganda ministers in totalitarian regimes have an ironclad grip on what the media and populace can share. That is one of the biggest differences between us and them. For example, would war protests stripped of the display of carnage be as effective in raising awareness of war&#039;s brutality? It is one thing for a country to go to war with the vast majority of its citizens blissfully unaware of the human costs to innocent non-combatants, but another thing altogether when people are confronted time and again with the harsh reality of what they are supporting. </p>
<p>The reality of innocent unborn children being dismembered inside the womb is something many supporters of abortion do not want people to see. This is understandable because it contradicts what many of them have said for years: namely, that abortion simply removes a blob of tissue. The pictures tell a different story, that indeed these are our tiny brothers and sisters who have met a brutal end. Their lives have been denied them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: truthseeker</title>
		<link>http://familiesagainstplannedparenthood.org/blog/2008/0804/free-speech-gets-pro-lifers-arrested-in-maryland/#comment-7757</link>
		<dc:creator>truthseeker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 05:23:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://familiesagainstplannedparenthood.org/blog/?p=260#comment-7757</guid>
		<description>10-4 Matt</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>10-4 Matt</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Yonke</title>
		<link>http://familiesagainstplannedparenthood.org/blog/2008/0804/free-speech-gets-pro-lifers-arrested-in-maryland/#comment-7756</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Yonke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 05:02:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://familiesagainstplannedparenthood.org/blog/?p=260#comment-7756</guid>
		<description>Truthseeker,

I didn't censor you. I just want comments to stay on topic. I think it can be safely said that I support graphic portrayals of abortion, whatever form they come in. I don't think your posts were inaccurate or attacking anyone and that's why they're still there.

Don't take a sabbatical on my account, let's just all try to keep the comments on the topic of the post. If they start to stray, start a thread in the forum.

No hard feelings at all here, truthseeker. Just doing my job.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Truthseeker,</p>
<p>I didn&#039;t censor you. I just want comments to stay on topic. I think it can be safely said that I support graphic portrayals of abortion, whatever form they come in. I don&#039;t think your posts were inaccurate or attacking anyone and that&#039;s why they&#039;re still there.</p>
<p>Don&#039;t take a sabbatical on my account, let&#039;s just all try to keep the comments on the topic of the post. If they start to stray, start a thread in the forum.</p>
<p>No hard feelings at all here, truthseeker. Just doing my job.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: truthseeker</title>
		<link>http://familiesagainstplannedparenthood.org/blog/2008/0804/free-speech-gets-pro-lifers-arrested-in-maryland/#comment-7755</link>
		<dc:creator>truthseeker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 04:54:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://familiesagainstplannedparenthood.org/blog/?p=260#comment-7755</guid>
		<description>Matt,
You are the moderator so you can control the content of posts on your blog.   I just didn't expect such censorship here cause the truth tour anf FVFAPP were my first exposure to graphic pictures and descriptions.  This is where I was taught the imporatnce of exposing the evil by putting it in the face of those who would rather ignore it and let the killing go on in tranquility.   I am sure you are aware that the plaintiff in the case I referenced was Planned Parenthood.  It is ironic that you would censor a post that played such a pivotal role in the judges decision.  Don't you realize it could also play a just a pivotal role in the decision of many Fox Valley citizens who might otherwise never read the truth about what Planned Parenthood stands for and uses our tax dollars to fight for.  The first time I read the description it had a profound impact on me personally.  
Perhaps that is why I am so driven to use it as a tool in my own struggle to stop Planned Parenthood.  I'll take a self-imposed two week sabattical from posting here.   Please feel free to remove this and any of my previous posts that you believe were off topic, too graphic, or not helpful to your struggle against Planned Parenthood.  I will take no offense to it.  God love you.  ts</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matt,<br />
You are the moderator so you can control the content of posts on your blog.   I just didn&#039;t expect such censorship here cause the truth tour anf FVFAPP were my first exposure to graphic pictures and descriptions.  This is where I was taught the imporatnce of exposing the evil by putting it in the face of those who would rather ignore it and let the killing go on in tranquility.   I am sure you are aware that the plaintiff in the case I referenced was Planned Parenthood.  It is ironic that you would censor a post that played such a pivotal role in the judges decision.  Don&#039;t you realize it could also play a just a pivotal role in the decision of many Fox Valley citizens who might otherwise never read the truth about what Planned Parenthood stands for and uses our tax dollars to fight for.  The first time I read the description it had a profound impact on me personally.<br />
Perhaps that is why I am so driven to use it as a tool in my own struggle to stop Planned Parenthood.  I&#039;ll take a self-imposed two week sabattical from posting here.   Please feel free to remove this and any of my previous posts that you believe were off topic, too graphic, or not helpful to your struggle against Planned Parenthood.  I will take no offense to it.  God love you.  ts</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KATHY</title>
		<link>http://familiesagainstplannedparenthood.org/blog/2008/0804/free-speech-gets-pro-lifers-arrested-in-maryland/#comment-7754</link>
		<dc:creator>KATHY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 23:54:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://familiesagainstplannedparenthood.org/blog/?p=260#comment-7754</guid>
		<description>I don't understand why they were arrested if they were protesting peacfully which it appears they were,I'm sure they weren't waving guns around. I don't think anyone is wrong I just don't happen to agree.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#039;t understand why they were arrested if they were protesting peacfully which it appears they were,I&#039;m sure they weren&#039;t waving guns around. I don&#039;t think anyone is wrong I just don&#039;t happen to agree.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mattyonke</title>
		<link>http://familiesagainstplannedparenthood.org/blog/2008/0804/free-speech-gets-pro-lifers-arrested-in-maryland/#comment-7753</link>
		<dc:creator>mattyonke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 21:16:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://familiesagainstplannedparenthood.org/blog/?p=260#comment-7753</guid>
		<description>Truthseeker,

This conversation is over. If you don't want to talk about arrests in Maryland, take it somewhere else.

Matt</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Truthseeker,</p>
<p>This conversation is over. If you don&#039;t want to talk about arrests in Maryland, take it somewhere else.</p>
<p>Matt</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger</title>
		<link>http://familiesagainstplannedparenthood.org/blog/2008/0804/free-speech-gets-pro-lifers-arrested-in-maryland/#comment-7752</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 18:17:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://familiesagainstplannedparenthood.org/blog/?p=260#comment-7752</guid>
		<description>truthseeker,

How we deliver the truth is just as important as the truth itself! (Eph. 4:15)

God Bless,
Roger</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>truthseeker,</p>
<p>How we deliver the truth is just as important as the truth itself! (Eph. 4:15)</p>
<p>God Bless,<br />
Roger</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: truthseeker</title>
		<link>http://familiesagainstplannedparenthood.org/blog/2008/0804/free-speech-gets-pro-lifers-arrested-in-maryland/#comment-7751</link>
		<dc:creator>truthseeker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 16:08:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://familiesagainstplannedparenthood.org/blog/?p=260#comment-7751</guid>
		<description>AuroraResident, I for one am willing to categorically say that anybody who supports those types of behaviours has the mindset of a sociopathic killer. Are you willing to say the same about Planned Parenthood and the rest who supported people's "right" to PBA?  A simple yes or no "ANSWER" to the question will suffice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AuroraResident, I for one am willing to categorically say that anybody who supports those types of behaviours has the mindset of a sociopathic killer. Are you willing to say the same about Planned Parenthood and the rest who supported people&#039;s &#034;right&#034; to PBA?  A simple yes or no &#034;ANSWER&#034; to the question will suffice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
