<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Motion filed to close Planned Parenthood</title>
	<atom:link href="http://familiesagainstplannedparenthood.org/blog/2007/1219/motion-to-close-planned-parenthood/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://familiesagainstplannedparenthood.org/blog/2007/1219/motion-to-close-planned-parenthood/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 17:32:51 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tara</title>
		<link>http://familiesagainstplannedparenthood.org/blog/2007/1219/motion-to-close-planned-parenthood/#comment-3608</link>
		<dc:creator>Tara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 14:51:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://familiesagainstplannedparenthood.org/blog/2007/1219/motion-to-close-planned-parenthood/#comment-3608</guid>
		<description>Halo - 

The most important right we are guarenteed by our Constitution is Life.  Without it Liberty, Happiness and "Choice" cannot even be discussed.  

As far as judging - Stating that abortion is the killing of a human being is not judging.  It is fact.   No different then when we stood against slvery.  That was legal, but it didn't make it right.

Wanting to help girls to make a decision by not having an abortion is not wrong either.  Family Planning is a joke.  It has nothing to do with helping a husband, wife and children plan their future.  Family Planning is another word for abortion and we all know it.  If it was really about planning then there would be prenatal care, post natal care, skills training, parenting classes, job placement, day care and housing assistance provided.  Put PP and other abortion providers DO NOT CARE about families they provide NONE of these services.  Churches and Christian organizations provide many of these services.

Being a Christian is often standing up and condeming what is wrong when society says it is right.  Jesus isn't just all love.  He called us to a difficult life that is completely different then the World.  He told us that if we "Chose" to follow Him, to expect the world to hate us.  And the world does.  I have no problem stating that I am sinner in need of a Savior.  

I use Jesus's example.  When he told others to cast the first stone at the adultress, he was telling them to make sure they weren't guilty of the same sin.  But then Jesus told her to go and sin no more!  He was showing her grace and mercy, but He was also was clear in the directive to change her lifestyle so that she would not be back in the same situation.  Jesus does this over and over.  He loves the sinner but hates the sin.  So should we as Christians. This is not hateful or intolerent.  It is the standard that we all must live up to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Halo - </p>
<p>The most important right we are guarenteed by our Constitution is Life.  Without it Liberty, Happiness and &#034;Choice&#034; cannot even be discussed.  </p>
<p>As far as judging - Stating that abortion is the killing of a human being is not judging.  It is fact.   No different then when we stood against slvery.  That was legal, but it didn&#039;t make it right.</p>
<p>Wanting to help girls to make a decision by not having an abortion is not wrong either.  Family Planning is a joke.  It has nothing to do with helping a husband, wife and children plan their future.  Family Planning is another word for abortion and we all know it.  If it was really about planning then there would be prenatal care, post natal care, skills training, parenting classes, job placement, day care and housing assistance provided.  Put PP and other abortion providers DO NOT CARE about families they provide NONE of these services.  Churches and Christian organizations provide many of these services.</p>
<p>Being a Christian is often standing up and condeming what is wrong when society says it is right.  Jesus isn&#039;t just all love.  He called us to a difficult life that is completely different then the World.  He told us that if we &#034;Chose&#034; to follow Him, to expect the world to hate us.  And the world does.  I have no problem stating that I am sinner in need of a Savior.  </p>
<p>I use Jesus&#039;s example.  When he told others to cast the first stone at the adultress, he was telling them to make sure they weren&#039;t guilty of the same sin.  But then Jesus told her to go and sin no more!  He was showing her grace and mercy, but He was also was clear in the directive to change her lifestyle so that she would not be back in the same situation.  Jesus does this over and over.  He loves the sinner but hates the sin.  So should we as Christians. This is not hateful or intolerent.  It is the standard that we all must live up to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ramir San Diego</title>
		<link>http://familiesagainstplannedparenthood.org/blog/2007/1219/motion-to-close-planned-parenthood/#comment-3607</link>
		<dc:creator>Ramir San Diego</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 14:38:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://familiesagainstplannedparenthood.org/blog/2007/1219/motion-to-close-planned-parenthood/#comment-3607</guid>
		<description>"We support a women's right to choose, we don't support killing babies. Which is why we aren't called, 'pro-kill all babies'. "
------------------------------------------

Halo,

A women's right or any person's right to choose ends where another person's rights begin. In this case, the woman's choice ends where the baby's right (to live) begins.  

If I chose to harass you, will you defend my right to choose? Obviously not, because it violates YOUR rights.

And oh, fyi, you call yourselves "pro-choice" because it is more acceptable and more palatable than being "PRO-ABORTION" (aka..pro-kill all babies) ...even if it's the truth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#034;We support a women&#039;s right to choose, we don&#039;t support killing babies. Which is why we aren&#039;t called, &#039;pro-kill all babies&#039;. &#034;<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;</p>
<p>Halo,</p>
<p>A women&#039;s right or any person&#039;s right to choose ends where another person&#039;s rights begin. In this case, the woman&#039;s choice ends where the baby&#039;s right (to live) begins.  </p>
<p>If I chose to harass you, will you defend my right to choose? Obviously not, because it violates YOUR rights.</p>
<p>And oh, fyi, you call yourselves &#034;pro-choice&#034; because it is more acceptable and more palatable than being &#034;PRO-ABORTION&#034; (aka..pro-kill all babies) &#8230;even if it&#039;s the truth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan the Methodist</title>
		<link>http://familiesagainstplannedparenthood.org/blog/2007/1219/motion-to-close-planned-parenthood/#comment-3605</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan the Methodist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 11:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://familiesagainstplannedparenthood.org/blog/2007/1219/motion-to-close-planned-parenthood/#comment-3605</guid>
		<description>Halo, please defend responsible freedom!!!!

What is responsible about unprotected sex???
What is responsible about 50 MILLION Abortions in 35 YEARS???

Please defend?

P.S. Is Halo your real name or is that your just a handle?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Halo, please defend responsible freedom!!!!</p>
<p>What is responsible about unprotected sex???<br />
What is responsible about 50 MILLION Abortions in 35 YEARS???</p>
<p>Please defend?</p>
<p>P.S. Is Halo your real name or is that your just a handle?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul2</title>
		<link>http://familiesagainstplannedparenthood.org/blog/2007/1219/motion-to-close-planned-parenthood/#comment-3604</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 05:53:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://familiesagainstplannedparenthood.org/blog/2007/1219/motion-to-close-planned-parenthood/#comment-3604</guid>
		<description>Halo, Michelle Anderson and her boyfriend just made a choice to wipe out six family members in Washington.  That was their idea of family planning.  They both said they loved the people they killed and after murdering them they said that they hoped the ones they killed were at peace.
     FAMILY PLANNING IS PRO FAMILY right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Halo, Michelle Anderson and her boyfriend just made a choice to wipe out six family members in Washington.  That was their idea of family planning.  They both said they loved the people they killed and after murdering them they said that they hoped the ones they killed were at peace.<br />
     FAMILY PLANNING IS PRO FAMILY right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul2</title>
		<link>http://familiesagainstplannedparenthood.org/blog/2007/1219/motion-to-close-planned-parenthood/#comment-3603</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 05:46:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://familiesagainstplannedparenthood.org/blog/2007/1219/motion-to-close-planned-parenthood/#comment-3603</guid>
		<description>Halo,  You are correct that everybody has an inalienable right to freedom of choice, but we have to do everything in our power to restrain people from choosing to kill one another.  And those babies inside the womb deserve protections because they are human life.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Halo,  You are correct that everybody has an inalienable right to freedom of choice, but we have to do everything in our power to restrain people from choosing to kill one another.  And those babies inside the womb deserve protections because they are human life.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://familiesagainstplannedparenthood.org/blog/2007/1219/motion-to-close-planned-parenthood/#comment-3602</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 04:09:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://familiesagainstplannedparenthood.org/blog/2007/1219/motion-to-close-planned-parenthood/#comment-3602</guid>
		<description>"Choice" demands an object.  It's not a stand-alone word, Halo.  You choose something.  I choose not to be violent.  That doesn't mean that were I to choose the opposite it would be okay because it was a choice.  By being in favor of the legalization of abortion, you are condoning abortion as a legitimate option.  Your opinion is to legitimize the killing of babies.  Word games are balm for only so long.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#034;Choice&#034; demands an object.  It&#039;s not a stand-alone word, Halo.  You choose something.  I choose not to be violent.  That doesn&#039;t mean that were I to choose the opposite it would be okay because it was a choice.  By being in favor of the legalization of abortion, you are condoning abortion as a legitimate option.  Your opinion is to legitimize the killing of babies.  Word games are balm for only so long.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Halo</title>
		<link>http://familiesagainstplannedparenthood.org/blog/2007/1219/motion-to-close-planned-parenthood/#comment-3601</link>
		<dc:creator>Halo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 02:54:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://familiesagainstplannedparenthood.org/blog/2007/1219/motion-to-close-planned-parenthood/#comment-3601</guid>
		<description>Paul2...

Although I shouldn't be endulging you, considering, like I already mentioned, you judge without knowing which is not at all Christian...or maybe it is...hm...

Anyway, I'm going to clear things up for you.  Which, you and many others, seem to be confused about.  Pro-choice supporters are just that...*pro-choice* supporters.  We support a women's right to choose, we don't support killing babies.  Which is why we aren't called, 'pro-kill all babies'.  We are supporting the RIGHT that all people have to make there own choice.  Whatever that choice maybe.  We support there right to make it and to have that choice available for all.  That's what I, and MANY others, are preserving.  Take away choice, and whats the next RIGHT to be taken away?  I really hate to think.

**FAMILY PLANNING IS PRO-FAMILY!!**</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul2&#8230;</p>
<p>Although I shouldn&#039;t be endulging you, considering, like I already mentioned, you judge without knowing which is not at all Christian&#8230;or maybe it is&#8230;hm&#8230;</p>
<p>Anyway, I&#039;m going to clear things up for you.  Which, you and many others, seem to be confused about.  Pro-choice supporters are just that&#8230;*pro-choice* supporters.  We support a women&#039;s right to choose, we don&#039;t support killing babies.  Which is why we aren&#039;t called, &#039;pro-kill all babies&#039;.  We are supporting the RIGHT that all people have to make there own choice.  Whatever that choice maybe.  We support there right to make it and to have that choice available for all.  That&#039;s what I, and MANY others, are preserving.  Take away choice, and whats the next RIGHT to be taken away?  I really hate to think.</p>
<p>**FAMILY PLANNING IS PRO-FAMILY!!**</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tara</title>
		<link>http://familiesagainstplannedparenthood.org/blog/2007/1219/motion-to-close-planned-parenthood/#comment-3598</link>
		<dc:creator>Tara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 23:49:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://familiesagainstplannedparenthood.org/blog/2007/1219/motion-to-close-planned-parenthood/#comment-3598</guid>
		<description>Just read this article, you can bet that Planned Parenthood's UN/International arm will be in the forefront of pushing the abortion agenda on countries that have abortion bans or those who have laws that regualtes or limit access.  Their tenticles are everywhere.  

The UN is useless and the US needs to continue to stand against its attempts to dictate US policies both domestic and international.  We also need to watch how much influence the International Court has over our own laws and judicial system.  This something we all need to watch and ask the Presidential Candidates how they view the UN and the International Court.

1-3-2008  
United Nations Rolls Out Liberal Agenda for 2008
Family News in Focus

Abortion and global warming rise to the top of the list.

Abortion rights and global warming top the United Nations’ list of priorities for the New Year. Pro-family experts say the agendas behind the list could be harmful to families.

Wendy Wright, president of Concerned Women for America, said the global organization wants to integrate "reproductive rights and services into various agencies and U.N. programs in order to promote abortion and sexual license.”

The U.N. is calling 2008 the International Year of Planet Earth. Thomas Jacobson, Focus on the Family Action's representative to the U.N., questions the association’s intentions.

“My guess is, along with other U.N. focuses on the environment in the past, it’s a mechanism in order for the U.N. to gain influence or control over greater areas of governance worldwide," he said.

The United States typically doesn’t adopt liberal U.N. policies, but the organization has had an influence on America's court system.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just read this article, you can bet that Planned Parenthood&#039;s UN/International arm will be in the forefront of pushing the abortion agenda on countries that have abortion bans or those who have laws that regualtes or limit access.  Their tenticles are everywhere.  </p>
<p>The UN is useless and the US needs to continue to stand against its attempts to dictate US policies both domestic and international.  We also need to watch how much influence the International Court has over our own laws and judicial system.  This something we all need to watch and ask the Presidential Candidates how they view the UN and the International Court.</p>
<p>1-3-2008<br />
United Nations Rolls Out Liberal Agenda for 2008<br />
Family News in Focus</p>
<p>Abortion and global warming rise to the top of the list.</p>
<p>Abortion rights and global warming top the United Nations’ list of priorities for the New Year. Pro-family experts say the agendas behind the list could be harmful to families.</p>
<p>Wendy Wright, president of Concerned Women for America, said the global organization wants to integrate &#034;reproductive rights and services into various agencies and U.N. programs in order to promote abortion and sexual license.”</p>
<p>The U.N. is calling 2008 the International Year of Planet Earth. Thomas Jacobson, Focus on the Family Action&#039;s representative to the U.N., questions the association’s intentions.</p>
<p>“My guess is, along with other U.N. focuses on the environment in the past, it’s a mechanism in order for the U.N. to gain influence or control over greater areas of governance worldwide,&#034; he said.</p>
<p>The United States typically doesn’t adopt liberal U.N. policies, but the organization has had an influence on America&#039;s court system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sylvia</title>
		<link>http://familiesagainstplannedparenthood.org/blog/2007/1219/motion-to-close-planned-parenthood/#comment-3597</link>
		<dc:creator>Sylvia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 21:50:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://familiesagainstplannedparenthood.org/blog/2007/1219/motion-to-close-planned-parenthood/#comment-3597</guid>
		<description>Hormonal contraceptives, e.g., the Pill, Norplant, Depo-provera, all have early abortion as a mode of action, some more than others.  Single-phase hormonal contraceptives (shots, implants, some pills), as well as IUDs, work primarily by disrupting the proper growth of the uterine lining, preventing implantation of a newly conceived human being.  Dual phase pills (estrogen/progesterone) have 3 modes of action:  preventing ovulation, impeding sperm motility, AND preventing implantation. Aside from threatening newly conceived babies, all hormonal contraceptives pose serious short and long term threats to the woman, including blood clots, stroke, heart attack, and breast cancer. So what about hormonal contraceptives?  They're dangerous.  If they were found in foods, the foods would be recalled for public health threat.
Condoms are playing Russian Roulette with one bullet in a 6-shooter--failure rates are the same for pregnancy (and likely much higher for disease  transmission).
So what are you left with?  Abstinence until marriage, then Natural Family Planning (NOT rhythm method) within marriage.  NFP is scientifically proven to be over 99% effective (better than the Pill). It is based on learning to identify signs of fertility and practicing periodic abstinence (8-10 days each cycle) if there is serious reason to avoid/postpone pregnancy. And it is even taught to couples by fertility specialists to help them conceive, since it does identify fertility. !00% safe for both mother and baby. Find out more at the &lt;a href="http://www.ccli.org" rel="nofollow"&gt;Couple to Couple League&lt;/a&gt;.

Sex was meant to be a total giving of oneself to one's spouse.  Anything other than that has serious negative consequences.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hormonal contraceptives, e.g., the Pill, Norplant, Depo-provera, all have early abortion as a mode of action, some more than others.  Single-phase hormonal contraceptives (shots, implants, some pills), as well as IUDs, work primarily by disrupting the proper growth of the uterine lining, preventing implantation of a newly conceived human being.  Dual phase pills (estrogen/progesterone) have 3 modes of action:  preventing ovulation, impeding sperm motility, AND preventing implantation. Aside from threatening newly conceived babies, all hormonal contraceptives pose serious short and long term threats to the woman, including blood clots, stroke, heart attack, and breast cancer. So what about hormonal contraceptives?  They&#039;re dangerous.  If they were found in foods, the foods would be recalled for public health threat.<br />
Condoms are playing Russian Roulette with one bullet in a 6-shooter&#8211;failure rates are the same for pregnancy (and likely much higher for disease  transmission).<br />
So what are you left with?  Abstinence until marriage, then Natural Family Planning (NOT rhythm method) within marriage.  NFP is scientifically proven to be over 99% effective (better than the Pill). It is based on learning to identify signs of fertility and practicing periodic abstinence (8-10 days each cycle) if there is serious reason to avoid/postpone pregnancy. And it is even taught to couples by fertility specialists to help them conceive, since it does identify fertility. !00% safe for both mother and baby. Find out more at the <a href="http://www.ccli.org" rel="nofollow">Couple to Couple League</a>.</p>
<p>Sex was meant to be a total giving of oneself to one&#039;s spouse.  Anything other than that has serious negative consequences.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Question</title>
		<link>http://familiesagainstplannedparenthood.org/blog/2007/1219/motion-to-close-planned-parenthood/#comment-3596</link>
		<dc:creator>Question</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 20:59:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://familiesagainstplannedparenthood.org/blog/2007/1219/motion-to-close-planned-parenthood/#comment-3596</guid>
		<description>Doesn't family planning include birth control?  I'm not referring to abortion which you're obviously opposed to, but what about birth control?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doesn&#039;t family planning include birth control?  I&#039;m not referring to abortion which you&#039;re obviously opposed to, but what about birth control?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
